Uploaded-material analysis
Use reports, PDFs, and datasets alongside a research prompt.
Research workspace
Research that keeps
the evidence in view.
Go beyond a fast answer — define the question, keep the sources visible, and preserve uncertainty for the decision-maker.
Enterprise SandboxedZero Model TrainingAudit Logged
How it works
A disciplined research loop
A practical, reviewable workflow—not a black box.
Research scope
Scope the decision before the crawl
Define the decision, the exclusions, and the recency window up front — the run targets an answer your team can act on, not a broad summary.
Question — scoped
Scope lockedDecisionPick a deployment approach for the team
In scopeSelf-host · managed · hybrid
ExclusionsPricing-only comparisons
RecencySources from the last 12 months
Acceptance criteria
Names a recommendation with trade-offs
Every claim linked to a source
Unknowns marked, not guessed
Compare the practical trade-offs of three deployment approaches for our team.
Multi-Source
web crawls, uploaded pdfs & arxiv papers
Direct Citations
every claim mapped to verifiable primary URL
Confidence Scoring
uncertainty, conflicts & counter-evidence visible
Persistent Memory
follow-up questions retain complete research state
In action
See the workspace, not a mock
A real working view — reviewable before anything ships.
Research brief
app.archeus.si
Carbon capture cost trends, 2019–2024
Sources read
nature.com — 2024 review
uploaded-report.pdf, p.14
annual-dataset.csv
Synthesized findings
12 citedModular system costs declined as deployment scale increased across 2019–2024, with pilot data converging around shared estimates.
Three independent reviews attribute the shift to standardized components rather than single-vendor breakthroughs.
Cost per tonne fell ~38% in the period, driven by modular designs1and economies of scale.
High confidence2 caveats
Capabilities
Built for evidence, not just prose
Cross-source synthesis
Compare themes and contradictions across the material you provide.
Cited outputs
Keep source references useful for review and follow-up.
Where it helps
Built around real team moments
Market landscape
Prepare an evidence-led overview before a strategy session.
“Compare the practical trade-offs of three deployment approaches for our team.”
Literature review
Organize supplied reading into themes and open questions.
“Group these sources by claim and flag which statements need verification.”
Decision brief
Share a concise research narrative with stakeholders.
“Write an executive brief with sources, caveats, and next research questions.”
Why teams switch
Less tool-switching. More useful work.
Without a connected workflowWith Archeus
A summary drops the evidence behind its claims.
The workflow makes sources and caveats part of the working output.
New questions require a full restart.
The same research context supports focused follow-ups.
Confidence is implied, not examined.
The output can name uncertainty and missing evidence.
Questions
What teams ask first
Create research your team can inspect and use.
Start with one real workflow, keep people in control, and build from what works.